On December 19, 2008
Joyce Valenza posted
When YouTube is blocked (seven ways around) on her blog,
School Library Journal.
She writes, “In so many ways, YouTube is the world's video portal. It is also, perhaps, the fastest growing website. Sure, lots of it is seedy and inappropriate. But so much of its content is legitimately important for education, for media and information fluency. For example, I blogged recently about the learning potential of the YouTube Symphony Orchestra, an international collaboration. YouTube's YouChoose became one of the richest presidential campaign resources. Our President-elect now chooses to upload his transition team messages to our nation on this portal.”
I find content on YouTube to use in my class and then need to download it at home. Apparently, I am not alone. She goes on to state “Pretty much everyday, in schools everywhere, and at homes at night, students and teachers are trying to figure out how to best capture video that is blocked to them during the school day.”
Ms. Valenza gives seven suggestions about ways around this. Included is a plea to help her build the “Video Pathfinder” in her wiki. Visit her blog and you will find there are some wonderful suggestions there that is well worth your time to peruse.
But what is even more telling is a comment on December 19, 2008 by Dave S. He says, “First the kids find ways around, now the teachers are sharing. I LOVE it! (Can you hear the tech directors screaming?!)” Somewhere, somehow, the collective minds in education/ tech communities on the internet must work to resolve the filtering/blocking issue for YouTube and other valid sites. There are some schools where teachers can not even read this post. Seedlings is a social networking site.
I have several suggestions:
1, We need to develop curriculum that teaches responsible skills that promote the acceptable use of Web 2.0 tools. Development of these skills must promote 21st Century learning for all students.
2. If filters must be in place, then all teachers must have over rides.
3. YouTube must develop a rating system for its videos that rates each video for explicit language, sex, or other, from a school’s point of view, inappropriate content. That way the objectionable material can be filtered if you choose to or even better, teach students to do their own.
What suggestions do you have?